Digital Camera Quality Comparison
Find Digital Camera Quality Comparison
1 Digital Camera Quality Comparison Loading
2 Digital Camera Quality Comparison Loading
3 Digital Camera Quality Comparison Loading
4 Digital Camera Quality Comparison Loading
5 Digital Camera Quality Comparison Loading
6 Digital Camera Quality Comparison Loading
Find Digital Camera Quality Comparison in Answers
Digital Camera Comparison? Which is better suited for my standards? PERSONAL PRIORITIES; -durability -quality night mode (my current night/dusk shots appear cluttered with "orbs" such as this; -decent movie capability (limited in length only by memory capacity) -sleek, compact -picture quality -value, I'M ON A BUDGET! I'm leaning towards one of these; > opinions? suggestions? THANKS! Sorry about that last link not working, here it is;>
Serena replied: "first link of bestbuy defff tht oneee"

foreverxgratefull replied: "well i have a nikon coolpix and i like it very much it is different from yours but i have had many other nikons and im very fond of them. u can have as long of videos as u have space for and its pretty compact its a lil more then i wanted to spend but im VERY happy with it. the picture quality is amazing heres the link to show you "

Looking for best way to pick a digital camera - web sites? I am on the hunt to purchase a new digital camera. I can't find a good web site that tells me not only price comparisons, but quality comparisons. Reviews, user feedback, etc. in a side-by-side type of view. Any suggestions? Thanks!

The Baron replied: "This is a very good website. This guy does real thorough research on digital cameras:"

Spot replied: "http://www.imaging-resource.com/DIGCAM01.HTM read 'til your heart's content!!!"

btsmith_y replied: "Digital Photography Review is my favorite-- read the reviews and the forums. Steve's DigiCams is another."

Stephen M replied: "Check out - best reviews on the web"

curoius george replied: "Ditto on steves-digicam.com"

When will (has it already) the quality (and what are valid methods for comparison) of digi's surpass SLR's? I'm thinking that the quality of digital cameras-the more recent ones, that is-are so amazing that they've possibly reached the point at which they're 'better' than the regular 35mm (or similar types) film-based cameras. Of course, 'better' means many different qualities and capabilities in this context. Just by the Mega-Pixel rating, is it really possible to say "OK, then camera A will *record* superior images in comparison to camera B."? I'd like to disregard photo paper, developing chemicals, pixels, printers, and the like. If the 'digitals' haven't surpassed the film cameras, seeing as how it is not possible for film cameras to 'improve', when should this point come?

fhotoace replied: "In the high ISO range, DLSR's surpassed film a while ago, both in maximum ISO and in quality. When you compare the noise of a image file shot at 3200 ISO with 3200 ISO film the digital image is much better AND the digital file is in colour. Now of course this is comparing 35 mm film to DSLR's that do not include medium format cameras. Of course a 4x5 view camera will out perform a DSLR in image quality, but certainly not in ease of use. Where digital cameras have difficulty is in the "art arena". Most collectors want the image shot by the artist, processed and printed by the photographer AND it has to be archival. This usually means black and white prints on fiber based paper or Ilfochrome (Cibachrome) colour prints ... hand printed and processed by the artist. That means NO inkjet prints ... at least for now."

Pooky replied: "A couple of ISO 3,200 here: Click on ALL SIZES to see larger one."

Digital camera comparisons please.? Looking to buy my first digital camera, with no experience in this area i want to be sure of getting value for money with good quality results.Can anyone recommend a camera under 100 wether it be bought online or not,with a zoom feature,pc hookup,decent memoryetc.... After searching the internet the Canon A610 seems a good buy ,Any thoughts?Priced at 89.99.

lulu replied: "Any zoom facility needs to be optical, as opposed to digital, zoom. Optical zoom gets you closer to the subject, Digital zoom gets you closer to the pixels, you lose picture quality"

hiljack39 replied: "I'm not really sure where you can buy one for that price. But I do know that you want to buy one with a 5.0 mega pixel and higher. if you want to have better picture and clarity. Also if you want a faster camera ( that way you will be able to a another picture right away or you will have to wait a longer time to take another pic) you'll need to buy one with more memory. But more expensive."

stevetayl@talk21.com replied: "If I am completely honest for less than 100 you are probably looking at a pretty basic model or end of line model (which is probably the bestmodel). If it is your first digital you will probably want a good point and shoot mode but at the same time there is nothing more frustrating than outgrowing the capacity of a camera. I have a Fuji S5000 myself which is an old model but at the same time it is adaptive to both basic ability to a high intermediate level which means that it has more longevity as it enables me to progress without needing to get a new model. It also has a very good optical zoom. They no longer produce the models but may have old stock available at a cheaper price as I have seen one for as low as 119. I have also seen a Fuji FinePix F460 Digital Camera for 89 which has a pretty poor 3x optical zoom but is a good starter camera. If you are looking at only printing pictures of 5x7 then 3million Mega Pixels will be sufficient it is only if you are looking at larger prints you start to see a reduction in clarity and crispness to the image. I also find Canon to be very good cameras but have limited experience with other brands although a friend swears by Olympus. I would recommend going to comparison site such as the one I mention below whereby you can search through a variety of sellers for the best deal."

The Tank replied: "It would be easy just to list a load of my favourate cameras but I don't think that's what you need. Based on the criteria in your question you should understand a bit about the why's and wherefores of camera features then you can make up your own mind. Completely disregard digital zoom figures. They are a cheap con by all manufacuruers. Digital zoom works by enlarging the central area of the imaging chip. They do not increase the number of pixels available so as you "zoom" your resolution reduces significantly. At anything above 2x your pictures will look fuzzy if you enlarge to 10x8 (about A4 size). If you want to 'digital zoom' then do it on your computer. Also, disregard 'special effects'. These can also be done on your PC with any cheap editing program so why bother with them in the camera? They're just marketing gimicks and you'll soon tire of them. Go for optical zoom of at least 3x if you can afford it. Almost all cheap digital cameras do not have an optical viewfinder. They make you use the screen on the back to frame your picture. There are two main disadvantages to this: 1) In bright light the screen can sometimes be hard to see clearly (the contrast is poor). 2) The battery goes flat twice as fast as a camera with an optical (old fashioned look-through) viewfinder. If your budget will reach then I wholeheartedly recommend that you buy one with an optical viewfinder. You will also find that these cameras are also better made than non-opticals. Most digital cameras allow you to select from a range of picture qualities. High quality will use more memory space than low quality. If you buy one with a rechargable battery then get a spare battery at the same time, and keep it charged and with you whenever you go out. A flat battery will spoil your shooting session. Make sure that your camera is 'future proof'. That means that accessories should be easily available if you decide to 'expand'. You asked about memory. There are several non-compatible ways that digital cameras use to store their images. There are Sony memory stick, SD cards, Compact Flash etc. You should know that although the Sony card is a "SONY", it is expensive and not widly used by other makers. The SD Card is the most common memory card type installed by most camera, television, computer, dvd manuacturers. So it has greater across the board compatibility. Note that most cameras come with a relatively small capacity memory card provided. Whatever type of card you use you will typically get over 100 standard definition photos on a 256MB card. This will vary considerably depending on the number of megapixels your camera has and the resolution (quality) that you set it for. Whatever you buy please read the book. Digital cameras can do all sorts of clever things and it's easy to not bother reading what can look like a complex book. You don't want to make silly mistakes or miss out on a good shot."

veito da costa replied: "Go along to your local Jessops and have a talk with them. I done it when I wanted to buy my dslr, and although I told them that I might not end up buying it from them, they were still very helpfull... Good luck..."

Ian C replied: "Forget the internet(heresy I know) but go to WH Smiths and purchase a copy of Digital Camera Buyer. This magazine compares cameras in the same price bracket and gives an independant, fair and honest review. Make your mind up from that rather than the blurb put out by the manufacturers."

Which fujifilm digital camera produce the best picture, see the link? I am thinking of getting s1500 and is cheaper. However the s2000HD seems to have some advantage over s1500 with a expensive price of cource. Since both are 10, mega pixels. Which one produce better image quality and why. >
Nik replied: "Fujifilm FinePix S1500 10MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide Angle Dual Image Stabilized Optical Zoom Price: $169.07 & ships FREE Technical Details 10.0-megapixel resolution for large, photo quality prints 12x wide-angle optical zoom; dual image stabilization Face Detection with Auto Red-Eye Removal; ISO 6400 2.7-inch LCD screen with Micro Thumbnail View 23 MB built-in memory; capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included) Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD 10MP Digital Camera with 15x Optical Dual Image Stabilized Zoom Price: $291.95 Technical Details 10-megapixel sensor captures enough detail for photo-quality 18 x 24-inch prints 15x optical zoom; wide-angle lens 2.7-inch LCD screen; Dual Image Stabilization HD compatible Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included) "

What's the difference in photo quality between film vs digital photographs? Is one superior to the other overall (ex. I know that cameras/lenses vary considerably among the two types of cameras)? Does one form tend to capture better contrast, b&w, colors, depth, etc? Just curious. Thanks!!! PS: I'm looking for comparisons only among photographs, not the comparisons among the obvious things such as the convenience of digital cameras, etc.

Photo Girl replied: "No matter how good you are at focusing in the camera, with digital photographs you will always have to sharpen the image in post production. You don't have to do this with film. Only amateurs will not agree with this... it's something you learn in photography school!"

dcrc93 replied: "film just always take better pictures"

Steve P replied: "This is a loaded question that has been debated for years, and likely will continue to be. Film, especially negative film, has a much better dynamic range than digital sensors. In other words, film can capture extremes of contrast better than digital. So in that sense, film is actually more "forgiving" than digital. That is why there is so much "excitement" in the digital world now with HDR, it is just trying to get some of the same range that has always been available in film. As far as resolution, it is generally agreed that the better DSLRs are pretty much the equal of 35mm film. However, medium format and especially large format film is another matter. Think about it, can an electronic sensor not much larger than a postage stamp REALLY compare to a film negative as large as 8 x 10 inches. There will likely never be a digital camera that can take the place of a large format view camera when it comes to a stunning, detailed LARGE print. Personally, I perfer my Mamiya medium format film camera to my big buck Canon 1Ds digital SLR for absolute finished quality, but there are times when digital just has too many other things in it's favor... but that is what you did NOT want to discuss! Here are some medium format film shots, though of course, the computer resolution and screen size cannot do them justice. steve"

Zomo replied: "Both can perform same work Camera does not matters but your eye and experience matters"

Raquel - replied: "A lot of people who shoot with film get noise in their picture. When they can't see what they've just taken a picture of, they aren't sure how they need to adjust their settings to prevent noise. It's a bit harder to shoot with film in this sense, and so people who shoot perfectly with film are the real experts. P.S. saying noise adds edge to picture is just an excuse for a bad shot."

prince charming64 replied: "Old film technology is still superior to digital technology as there is more detail in the picture. One day digital film will one day catch up. If you want deep crisp resolution in photographs buy a medium format camera. with good quality film,you will have outstanding photographs."

Affordable Digital camera at the range of Rs. 5000-Rs. 7000? hello, I researched a lot of websites for digital cameras review & price comparison but was not happy with the result & got completely confused. Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Cannon & Kodak Cameras are available in market which different price & quality. I am not able to decide which digital cameras to buy with min 7MP in between the price range of Rs. 5000 to Rs. 7000. Support your answer with a link to further study about it. Best & first one to answer correctly will get 10 points & 5 Star... It would be better to mention model name along with price

devi sri replied: "Rs5000 in camera shop"

ramkya replied: "go for sony as it has best shop outlet through out.but it costs little costly .if u go with olympus it is cost wise less.but sony is very user friendly.forget your 5 star and 10 points .u go with sony then i will give u 5 *****"

gingosse replied: "CANON CAMERAS ARE THE BEST ON THE MARKET QUALITY/PRICE"

Naveena P replied: "You can check out this site as they show all the features along with some exclusive deals and discounts on this site."

zuber_navy replied: "go for a sony digicam in this range.no need to be confused.your budget is pretty economical so go for a sony"

Holmes replied: "Canon Powershot A550, best go. Rs 6945-at sifymall."

Jennifer B replied: "U can get Kodak for rs. 7000 and if u have exhausted all possible websites for deals and info then check out open2save.in as they have discounts and deals on good brands across all categories. "

JP replied: "For your price range you can get a Kodak camera."

UltraCompact Camera Comparison? For Nikon, Canon, Fujifilm and Sony, tell me what the brand's particular advantage from the other company's. (Why makes them stand out) Which has the lowest noise? Best image quality? Why do most people buy Sony digital cameras? Are they any good? Actual experience with the different brands preferred.

Dr. Sam replied: "Who says most people buy Sony's? I think Canon is the leading seller. Here is a list of "Top Ten" cameras used for photos uploaded on Flickr. The first Sony listed is at #19. The next one is #24. These are not sales, but inquiries on dpreview.com: There are almost three times as many inquiries on Canon than Sony. Why can't I find total sales anywhere??? I own a a Canon Powershot SD900 and I think it's a great camera. With the larger sensor, noise is less of an issue with this camera than most ultracompact cameras. Here is one photo I put on-line that I took with the SD900. Click on "All Sizes" and view this as large as possible and check out the birds. This was taken right after sunset and there were no enhancements in afterprocessing. Here's another photo with no post-processing at all. It was taken at the full 111 mm (equiv) zoom. It was taken in the fully automatic mode with no help from me at all. The horizon is crooked because the camera was resting on the top of my car. I did not want to alter anything, because this is part of a 3-image series comparing optical zoom with cropping to digital zoom. You can look at the other pictures while you are there and see why optical zoom is all that matters. Go here to see the comparison article on 5 compact camera and see what you think. If you really don't want to read reviews, I am still happy that I am got the Canon SD900 and this would be my recommendation for anyone at this point, since it is what I chose for myself. Click on the name of each camera to read a detailed review. I have also used a Canon SD700 for a bit, side-by-side, and I think it's a great little camera. I was going to get this model for myself, but it was simply sold out everywhere for a couple of months when I was ready to buy. Maybe I should have waited... It costs $300, has good zoom range and the image stabilization to go with it. It's SMALL and good looking. Great LCD and it still has an optical viewfinder. (In Europe, this same camera is known as the IXUS 800 IS, so don't let the label on the camera confuse you. This is NOT the SD800-IS, which is known in Europe as the IXUS 850 IS.) I had Nikon P&S cameras before Canon (still have them...) and I wish I could remain loyal to Nikon, but I think that Canon has surpassed them in this arena. I am a Nikon dSLR owner, too. Look for: Larger sensor Optical viewfinder At least 6-7 megapixels"

friendly fox replied: "check out dpreview.com to see a good comparison of the different brands and models available in the ultracompact cameras from people who know what theyre talking about. i found it very helpful in purchasing my ultracompact camera just a few months ago. i myself have always been a nikon user with my slr's and dslr's, but i just couldnt ignore all the reviews on the canon especially the sd800 is. i do love it and am very happy with my decision. you need to check out all the options available on the various models and weigh which ones are most important to you. I love my big old dslr and what it can do, but i have come to love being able to throw my ultracompact in my pocket for trips to disneyland or to keep in my purse for everyday availability. good luck with your decision!"

vienna2001 replied: "All cameras with the same size sensor and megapixel count take approximately the same picture, so it really doesn't matter which brand you choose. All four companies are feverishly working to develop a cure for the hellacious digital noise inherent in tiny sensors. Fuji has been marginally more successful than the others, but they are all pretty poor. To answer your question, I'd say none of them stand out. Not until you get into the realm of DSLRs, anyway."

Ken F replied: "I like Canon the best...they are always improving upon reducing noise. Canon and Nikon have the best image quality. I have no experience with Fujifilm, but I love them as a film company...I use their Velvia 100 a lot. Sony is marketed to the masses and, as a result, you pay a premium for mostly just their brand-name. Sony tends to put a lot of bells and whistles into their products, but the thing I really hate is their proprietary hardware, which makes it more expensive and often inconvenient for the customer. Their cameras tend to become 'obsolete' very fast."

What is the best RED DIGITAL CAMERA with at least 12 mega pixels & the optical is more than 3x's? I'm interested in quality as well as the cheapest price and ultimately I'm looking for comparisons between several or more as well.

c_j_ryan replied: "lol, you ladies and your camera colors! Here's a few red ones! The Canon PowerShot SD780 IS, 12mpx, 3x zoom, PowerShot A480, 10 mpx, 3.3 zoom, Nikon Cool Pix 5630, 12mpx, 7x zoom, Coolpix 5710, 14.5mpx, 3.6x zoom, OK I was going to look up some Sony's, Panasonics, and Pentax's for you but I got bored. And besides, you're "cheapest" price range didn't leave me much to go with! Just be aware, in a P&S camera pixels don't mean much!"

Comparison of digital compact cameras? I'm looking to buy a point&shoot camera for my sister to supplement her DSLR - but I don't know what I should get. I have a few ideas: 1) Sony W300 2) Fujifilm Finepix F100fd 3) Panasonic something (any recommendations?) 4) Canon something (again, any recommendations?) - I heard that canon cameras are the best in their image quality. I'm looking for something that allows manual control - like aperture priority and shutter priority and options like that. I also want very defined colours with good saturation (but I think this is more to do with the photographer's skill) and little noise. The colour features that canon has are cool too but of course if another camera would produce better quality images, colour-fun is hardly going to be that important. I've been on dpreviews.com but I get very contradicting reviews, and I don't really understand the specs. Also it doesn't help when I don't know which Panasonic/Canon camera to look at. So.. help please? Thanks for the advice!

hipp5 replied: "Since your sister already has a DSLR I wouldn't worry too much about getting a camera that has all the features - if she wants lots of control she'll use her DSLR. My bigger concern with this is that DSLRs are big so she won't always carry it with her, so get a camera that's small enough that she can always have it on her. I have the Canon SD1000 as a supplement to my DSLR. It's a little lacking on the manual controls but it takes decent pictures and is small enough that I ALWAYS have it in my pocket. Having the camera in my pocket allows me to be ready for those spontaneous shots when I don't have my DSLR with me."

neuroguy replied: "sony wsc-150, canon sd-870 is"

More Links
Find More
Digital Camera Quality Comparison © 2009

Credit Cards  |  Emo Names  |  Pickup Lines
Report Abuse to: abuse(at)5nxs.com